ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Impact of ERAS Protocol on Postoperative Recovery and Complications in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Comparative Analysis.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and Surgical Site Infections (SSIs).Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a proven perioperative strategy that improves outcomes in major surgeries, but its role in routine procedures like cholecystectomy remains underexplored. To compare perioperative practices and postoperative complications between ERAS and conventional protocols in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized study was conducted over 18 months in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 100 patients were divided equally into ERAS and control groups. The ERAS group received structured interventions including pre-op counseling, carb loading, epidural anesthesia, and early mobilization. Outcomes such as pain, PONV and surgical site infections (SSI) were assessed. Results: ERAS patients showed 100% compliance with protocol elements and had faster recovery milestones. Post-op pain (4% vs. 22%), PONV (2% vs. 16%), and SSI (2% vs. 12%) were significantly lower in the ERAS group. The difference in SSI was statistically significant ( Conclusion: ERAS protocol notably enhances recovery and minimizes complications in cholecystectomy. It offers a practical and cost-effective upgrade over traditional care even for routine surgeries. Wider adoption and multicentric validation are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.