Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41164501›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

Patterns of Human Medication Use in Animals: A Prospective Observational Study in Saudi Arabia.

Jisha Myalil Lucca, Maryam Abdulmohsen E Alhamad, Zainab Ali A Al Matar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jisha Myalil LuccaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE.
Maryam Abdulmohsen E AlhamadDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Zainab Ali A Al MatarDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds: Pets relate to the public in significant ways, impacting the physical and mental well-being of their owners. Inappropriate usage of medications in animals poses substantial public health concerns when used in food-producing animals. Methodology: A population-based cross-sectional online survey was conducted throughout Saudi Arabia from December 2022 to April 2023. This study aims at the extra-labeled use of drugs among pet owners in KSA. Findings: A total of 347 pet oweners were included in the study. Cats (63%) and birds (30.54%) were the common pets, and 59.65% of pet owners gave regular vaccines to the pets. Only 10% of participants used human medications on pets. Antibiotics and topical agents were the most commonly used human medications in animals, and approximately half of the participants reported using them with a reduced dose. This practice can lead to suboptimal treatment outcomes and exacerbate antimicrobial resistance. Although 53% of participants acknowledged that only veterinarians are authorized to prescribe animal medications, nearly half believed that pet owners can also administer human drugs to animals. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of promoting responsible medication practices and enhancing pet owners' awareness to safeguard animal and human health.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceeducationmedication usepet ownerspublic healthSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID41164501
PMCPMC12563437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.