ReviewGlobal health & medicine2025
Research progress on intrinsic capacity in older adults: Concepts, epidemiology, assessments, influencing factors, adverse outcomes, and interventions.
Review in Global health & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fatigue, muscle fatigability, and the Hallmarks of Aging: a narrative review.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2026Review
- The joint association of intrinsic capacity and physical activity with cardiovascular risk in older adults: evidence from four longitudinal cohorts.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Responding to a super-aged society: A community-based model for early frailty detection using AI and smart meter data -Insights from Japan.Global health & medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrinsic capacity (IC), introduced by the World Health Organization, is a core concept in the framework of healthy ageing. This study reviews the relevant concepts, epidemiology, assessments, influencing factors, adverse outcomes, and interventions concerning IC. IC refers to the composite of physical and mental capacities that an individual can draw on to live independently and thrive. Although IC is closely related to frailty and physiological reserve (PR), there are conceptual differences: IC represents the inherent functional reserve, frailty reflects the cumulative state of functional deficits, and physiological reserve emphasizes the ability to resist functional physical decline. IC assessments include comprehensive screening instruments of Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) and combinations of domain-specific scales; however, these approaches face challenges such as the inability to provide quantifiable results and the lack of standardized criteria, highlighting the urgent need to develop a standardized IC assessment system. Biomarkers may serve as supportive assessment tools, but their application is limited by cost and insufficient evidence, underscoring the need for future development of predictive models that integrate them. The main factors influencing IC include sociodemographic characteristics, physical health, psychosocial factors, and lifestyle. IC is strongly associated with health outcomes, serving as an effective predictor of several adverse outcomes. Interventions targeting IC primarily include ICOPE-guided multidomain interventions, along with other interventions such as multicomponent exercise, cognitive stimulation therapy, and dietary intervention; however, high-quality controlled trials remain limited, and the optimal timing and mechanisms of intervention require further investigation. This review offers important insights for clinical practice and research aimed at promoting healthy ageing among older populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.