Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41164427›Full record

ReviewPrecision radiation oncology2025

Application of high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Tianyao Wang, Yifan Tao, Guanghui Gan, Long Chen, Yuan Xu, Fei Sun, Xiaoting Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Precision radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. NovelFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. A novel frameshift variant inFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tianyao WangFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1744-4333
Yifan TaoFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou China.
Guanghui GanFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou China.
Long ChenFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou China.
Yuan XuFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou China.
Fei SunFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou China.
Xiaoting XuFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluates the efficacy, toxicity, and survival impact of high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-EBT) as neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: A review of 16 studies from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (1990-2023) was conducted. Results: Patients treated with HDR-EBT alone had a pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 23.7%-35.3% (mean: 24.3%), anal preservation rate of 12.2%-74.9% (mean: 41.8%), and 5-year progression-free survival rate of 64.6%-65.4% (mean: 65.3%). When combined with concurrent long-term radiotherapy and chemotherapy, pCR rates improved from 18.1%-55.0% (mean: 31.0%), with anal preservation rates of 39.6%-51.4% (mean: 45.3%). However, overall survival did not significantly improve. Conclusion: Integrating advanced techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with HDR-EBT shows promise. This approach particularly benefits patients ineligible for surgery or those adopting a watch-and-wait strategy after complete clinical remission, thus highlighting the potential of HDR-EBT in this treatment landscape.

Indexed as

High‐dose‐rate BrachytherapyRectal cancerSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41164427
PMCPMC12559926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.