ArticlePrecision radiation oncology2025
Fast estimation of patient-specific organ doses from abdomen and head CT examinations without segmenting internal organs using machine learning models.
Article in Precision radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safe surgical management of two concomitant giant hepatic hydatid cysts: a case report.Patient safety in surgery · 2026Article
- Development and feasibility assessment of an automated, synthetic CT-guided plan selection system for bladder cancer adaptive radiotherapy: a retrospective pilot study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Liver involvement in pediatric acute leukemia: subtype differences and complex hepatic injury as a novel marker for AML risk stratification.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Fast estimation of patient-specific organ doses from abdomen and head CT examinations without segmenting internal organs using machine learning models.Precision radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Computed Tomography (CT) imaging is essential for disease detection but carries a risk of cancer due to X-ray exposure. Typically, assessing this risk requires segmentation of the internal organ contours to predict organ doses, which hinders its clinical application. This study introduces a method that uses support vector regression (SVR) models trained on skin outline radiomic features to predict organ doses without organ segmentation, thus streamlining the process for clinical use. Methods: CT scans of the head and abdomen were used to extract radiomic features of the skin outline. These features were used as inputs, with organ doses from Monte Carlo simulations as benchmarks to train the SVR models for predicting organ doses. The accuracy of the models was evaluated using the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and coefficient of determination (R Results: The results showed a high precision in dose prediction for various organs, including the brain (MAPE: 1.5%, R Conclusions: The SVR models efficiently predicted patient-specific organ doses from CT scans, offering a user-friendly tool for rapid segmentation-free dose prediction. This innovation can significantly enhance clinical efficiency and accessibility in predicting patient-specific organ doses using CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.