ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Risk factors and predictive model construction for severe complications following repair of perforated peptic ulcer.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify risk factors and construct a prediction model for severe complications(Clavien-Dindo Classification III-V)following repair of perforated peptic ulcers. Methods: Clinical data from 230 patients who underwent perforated peptic ulcer repair at Haiyan County People's Hospital and Jiaxing Second Hospital between January 2018 and June 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to screen relevant variables, followed by the development of a risk prediction model for severe complications, with predictive performance validated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The cohort comprised 230 patients (185 males, 45 females) with a mean age of 62.2 ± 17.8 years, predominantly presenting with gastric perforations. Severe postoperative complications occurred in 42 cases (18.3%). In ERAS patients, advantages were observed in terms of the incidence of severe complications and length of hospital stay; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Analytical results indicated that alcohol use history, ASA score, admission nutritional score, CRP level, and preoperative albumin level were independent risk factors for severe complications ( Conclusion: This prediction model demonstrates high accuracy for severe complications after peptic ulcer perforation repair, providing valuable guidance for clinical monitoring and early preventive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.