ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Revised understanding of iatrogenic lumbosacral nerve bowstringing disease: a case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Iatrogenic lumbosacral nerve bowstringing disease (ILNBD) is a severe complication of spinal surgery. The clinical presentation is often insidious and may be misdiagnosed as nerve root compression. Heightened diagnostic vigilance supported by characteristic radiological findings is essential. Case presentation: This case report a 63-year-old woman who underwent L3-L5 interbody fusion and internal fixation surgery for vertebral slippage combined with lumbar spinal stenosis. Her symptoms improved significantly on the second day after surgery, but she suddenly developed lower limb neurological dysfunction on the fifth day after surgery. Imaging studies showed that the internal fixation and interbody fusion devices were well positioned, with increased spinal canal volume and no space-occupying lesions. However, axial MRI revealed high tension of the cauda equina and positive nerve descent signs, consistent with the characteristics of bowstring disease. Conclusion: Excessive expansion of the intervertebral space can lead to sustained static traction on the nerve roots. The appropriate fusion device height should be determined through a stepwise expansion test to avoid increased axial tension on the nerves. Additionally, technical operational details can independently induce bowstring syndrome, and stepwise tension assessment is crucial for preventing traction-related nerve damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.