ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025
Research trends in nutrition and exercise for sarcopenic obesity: a bibliometric analysis.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The global state of GLIM criteria in oncology: a bibliometric analysis of research trends (2019-2025).Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: With global population aging and obesity rates rising, the prevalence of sarcopenic obesity (SO) is being rapidly increased, resulting in significant health impacts and making it a growing public health concern in academic circles. Exercise and nutrition are crucial in the etiology, prevention, and management of SO; therefore, bibliometric research in this field can provide key insights for future scientific inquiry. Methods: The literature concerning on nutrition and exercise in SO published over the past 20 years and indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection database and Scopus database was screened, and bibliometric analyses were subsequently conducted using CiteSpace and VOSviewer. Results: A total of 658 literatures were selected for bibliometric analysis. A steady rise in publications in this field over 20 years was shown by the results, with major contributions being made by China and the US. The most literatures were published by the University Clermont Auvergne, with Professor Yves Boirie being identified as the most prolific author. The journal Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of nutrition and exercise research in SO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.