ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Elysee Exosome Versus Cellbooster Lift in Oral Wound Healing.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of injecting Elysee exosomes or Cellbooster Lift in promoting the healing of oral mucosal wounds. Methods: Thirty-six adult Wistar Albino rats were randomly divided into 3 groups. Group 1 served as the control group and underwent a scalpel incision in the oral mucosa without any intervention. Group 2 received an injection of Cellbooster Lift immediately after the incision, whereas group 3 was treated with Elysee exosomes. Biopsy samples were collected at baseline, as well as on the 7th and 14th postoperative days, for histological analysis. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was used to assess epithelial regeneration, whereas Masson trichrome staining was utilized to evaluate collagen formation and granulation tissue organization. Results: Both the Cellbooster Lift and Elysee exosome-treated groups showed improvements in wound healing compared with the control group. Both treatments accelerated healing, evidenced by increased collagen deposition and well-organized granulation tissue. Although the clinical outcomes were comparable between the Cellbooster Lift and Elysee exosome groups, histological analysis revealed that exosomes led to advanced epithelial regeneration and collagen formation, indicating their enhanced efficacy in promoting wound recovery. Conclusions: The injection of either Elysee exosomes or Cellbooster Lift enhanced the healing of oral mucosal wounds, with both treatments showing clinically similar improvements in recovery and tissue regeneration. However, histologically, exosomes demonstrated acceptable results, particularly in epithelial regeneration and collagen formation. These findings suggest that both therapies could be effective for oral wound healing, with exosomes offering an enhanced regenerative potential.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.