ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
The Systematic Multiverse Analysis Registration Tool for defining multiverse analyses.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Systematic Multiverse Analysis Registration Tool for defining multiverse analyses.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiverse analysis is increasingly recognized as a systematic framework for assessing the robustness of scientific results across alternative defensible data processing and analysis pipelines. However, defining the multiverse, by identifying defensible combinations of options across multiple nodes in the analysis workflow, remains a cognitively and logistically demanding and complex task. Consequently, documentation of how multiverse analyses are constructed and the rationale behind decisions made is often incomplete, which risks the transparency and interpretability of robustness claims. The Systematic Multiverse Analysis Registration Tool (SMART) addresses this gap. SMART guides users from diverse scientific disciplines through the construction of multiverse analyses via a transparent, stepwise workflow. It guides the users through all defensibility and equivalence decisions and documents each decision made. This supports the creation of complete multiverses within user-defined criteria, with visual and numerical feedback to highlight potential errors along the procedure. The exportable documentation can be used for preregistration or included as supplementary material alongside the published manuscript to report uncertainty at the level of multiverse construction. By increasing the transparency, reproducibility and rigour in multiverse construction, and bringing cohesion to this procedure across multiverse analyses, SMART facilitates more interpretable robustness assessments and contributes to the broader goals of open and reproducible science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.