Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41164340›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

The Systematic Multiverse Analysis Registration Tool for defining multiverse analyses.

Cassie Ann Short, Yusuf Coşku Inceler, Maximilian Frank, Andrea Hildebrandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cassie Ann ShortDepartment of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Niedersachsen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7799-7783
Yusuf Coşku IncelerDepartment of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Niedersachsen, Germany.
Maximilian FrankDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Bayern, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8140-3519
Andrea HildebrandtDepartment of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Niedersachsen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiverse analysis is increasingly recognized as a systematic framework for assessing the robustness of scientific results across alternative defensible data processing and analysis pipelines. However, defining the multiverse, by identifying defensible combinations of options across multiple nodes in the analysis workflow, remains a cognitively and logistically demanding and complex task. Consequently, documentation of how multiverse analyses are constructed and the rationale behind decisions made is often incomplete, which risks the transparency and interpretability of robustness claims. The Systematic Multiverse Analysis Registration Tool (SMART) addresses this gap. SMART guides users from diverse scientific disciplines through the construction of multiverse analyses via a transparent, stepwise workflow. It guides the users through all defensibility and equivalence decisions and documents each decision made. This supports the creation of complete multiverses within user-defined criteria, with visual and numerical feedback to highlight potential errors along the procedure. The exportable documentation can be used for preregistration or included as supplementary material alongside the published manuscript to report uncertainty at the level of multiverse construction. By increasing the transparency, reproducibility and rigour in multiverse construction, and bringing cohesion to this procedure across multiverse analyses, SMART facilitates more interpretable robustness assessments and contributes to the broader goals of open and reproducible science.

Indexed as

documentationmultiverse analysispreregistrationrobustnesstransparency

Identifiers

PMID41164340
PMCPMC12567067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.