ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) demonstrates comparable predictive validity to Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) for return to sport after anatomic ankle ligament reconstruction.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) demonstrates comparable predictive validity to Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) for return to sport after anatomic ankle ligament reconstruction.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Anatomic ankle ligament reconstruction (AALR) has shown positive outcomes in managing chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential for evaluating treatment efficacy, but the optimal tool for this population remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the discriminative capacity and predictive ability for Return to Sport (RTS) between two validated PROMs: the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), in patients undergoing AALR. Methods: A retrospective study included 140 patients who underwent arthroscopically-assisted AALR with gracilis autograft or allograft between January 2019 and January 2023, with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Patients completed FAAM and CAIT questionnaires preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Correlations between FAAM and CAIT scores were assessed using Spearman coefficients across different timelines. Discriminative capacity and predictive ability for RTS were also compared using Wilcoxon test, ROC and Area under the Curve (AUC) analysis. Results: Strong correlations between CAIT and FAAM were observed preoperatively ( Conclusion: Both CAIT and FAAM demonstrated comparable discriminative capacity and predictive ability for Return to Sport following AALR; given its brevity, ease of administration, and specificity to ankle instability, CAIT is a valid and efficient alternative to FAAM for postoperative outcome assessment in this population. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.