ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Detection of antimicrobial peptides from fecal samples of FMT donors using deep learning.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent a class of short peptides that are widely distributed in organisms and are regarded as an effective means to tackle bacterial resistance, potentially functioning as substitutes for onventional antibiotics. Methods: We employed metagenomics in combination with deep learning to mine AMPs from the 120 fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) donor metagenome. Subsequently, a comprehensive analysis of the candidate AMPs was conducted through metaproteomic cross-validation, solubility analysis, cross-validation with other prediction tools, correlation analysis, and molecular dynamics simulations. Finally, four candidate AMPs were selected for chemical synthesis, and experimental validation identified two with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. Furthermore, molecular docking was utilized to further analyze the antimicrobial mechanisms of the candidate AMPs. Results: Our approach successfully predicted 2,820,488 potential AMPs. After a comprehensive analysis, four candidate AMPs were selected for synthesis, two of which exhibited broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. Molecular docking provided further insight into the binding mechanisms of these peptides. Discussion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of discovering functional AMPs from the human fecal microbiome using computational and experimental approaches, highlights the potential of mining novel AMPs from the fecal microbiome, and provides new insights into the therapeutic mechanisms of FMT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.