Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41164178›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Patient-centered modeling of the breast biopsy experience.

Isabel Nieto-Alvarez, Erik Bojorges-Valdez, Elvira Lang, Mohammadreza Ranaei Sharif, Göran Köber, Nicolas Rohleder, Oliver Amft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isabel Nieto-AlvarezChair of Digital Health, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Erik Bojorges-ValdezDepartment of Engineering Studies for Innovation, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, Mexico.
Elvira LangHypnalgesics, LLC, Brookline, MA, United States.
Mohammadreza Ranaei SharifIntelligent Embedded Systems Lab., University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Göran KöberIntelligent Embedded Systems Lab., University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Nicolas RohlederChair of Health Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Oliver AmftIntelligent Embedded Systems Lab., University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite significant advances in breast cancer screening and early detection over recent decades, rising patient volumes, limited resources, and time constraints hinder healthcare teams from anticipating distress and effectively managing the patient experience. We leveraged real-world data from 236 patients during a breast biopsy procedure and follow-up period. Objective: The study goal was to model important components of the multifaceted biopsy procedure and its effect on patient experience. Methods: We integrated data from patient-reported outcomes, psycho-social assessments, and workflow annotations. Results: We (1) provide a visual model of the patient pathway, (2) predict, with linear mixed models and machine learning, anxiety based on psychological pre-assessments as well as procedural events, and (3) analyze communication between caregiver and patient to understand moderators of the patient experience. Predictive modeling revealed significant correlation between psychological pre-assessments and median anxiety during biopsy (IES β = 0.91, CES-D β = 0.8, PSS β = 0.62, STAI β = 0.58, all with Conclusion: Our findings highlight the potential of combining data to model patient experience during a medical procedure. Our work helps to develop digital twins of medical procedures to support clinicians to provide proactive care and mitigate patient distress.

Indexed as

breast biopsydigital twin medical procedurelinear mixed model (LME)NLPpatient experience

Identifiers

PMID41164178
PMCPMC12558924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.