ArticleDigital health
Do teleconsultations increase patient access to orthopaedic care?
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Clinical Performance, Limitations, and Translational Readiness-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluates whether orthopaedic teleconsultations provide timelier access compared to in-person visits. Methods: We prospectively analysed scheduling data (1 July 2022-1 January 2023) for the 15 busiest orthopaedic surgeons (by total teleconsultations) at a Midwest academic healthcare system. Three metrics were assessed using EHR data: (1) third next available clinic day (adjusted for physician visit modality frequency via standardization: Results: Appointment data from seven orthopaedic surgeons were analysed for third next available/same day metrics; lead time included data from six surgeons. In-person appointments had a shorter median availability (2 vs. 3 clinic days, p < 0.001), which means at current in-person/teleconsultation frequencies a patient was able to schedule an in-person visit 1 clinic day faster than a teleconsultation. When adjusted for a lower frequency, teleconsultations had better access efficiency (3.53 vs. 46.88, p < 0.001, lower = better access)-they were easier to schedule relative to their availability. Same day availability was higher for teleconsultations (31.15% available vs. 16.2% available, p < 0.001). New teleconsultations had shorter lead times (median 5.0 days vs. 13.0 days, p < 0.01). Conclusion: When visits were standardized, teleconsultations provide greater access compared to in-person visits relative to their frequency. Additionally, even with the current visit volume (in-person = 92%, teleconsultation = 8%), new patients were able to see providers sooner through teleconsultations. While in-person orthopaedic visits cannot be replaced by virtual visits, particularly in cases of acute pathology, increasing the availability of teleconsultation appointments can enhance access. Appropriate digital infrastructure, training, and workflow are necessary to ensure the appropriate selection of visit modalities. Level of evidence: II (Prospective Cohort).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.