ArticlePublic health challenges2025
Spatial Distribution of COVID-19 Diagnostic Services in Mopani District, Limpopo Province, South Africa.
Article in Public health challenges, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatial Distribution of COVID-19 Diagnostic Services in Mopani District, Limpopo Province, South Africa.Public health challenges · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Access to healthcare facilities in rural areas remains a major challenge, particularly during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study investigated the spatial distribution and accessibility of COVID-19 point-of-care (POC) diagnostic services in Mopani District, Limpopo province, South Africa, using a geographic information system (GIS)-based approach. The aim was to identify areas where healthcare access requires improvement. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was used, analysing secondary data through dasymetric mapping to disaggregate and re-aggregate population data into analytical units. Accessibility was measured by distances from residences to the nearest primary healthcare (PHC) clinics (<5 km) and from clinics to the nearest district hospitals (<30 km). Demographic and socio-economic data from Statistics South Africa were included for context. Results: Mopani District had an estimated population of 1,202,916, with 942,801 (78.4%) residing within 5 km of a PHC clinic. The district had 105 clinics, each serving about 11,456 people, and 72 (68.6%) of these clinics were within 30 km of a district hospital. The district contained both densely and sparsely populated areas, with high unemployment and low-income levels, particularly in rural regions. Limited public transport further constrained access. Ba-Phalaborwa, Maruleng, Greater Tzaneen and Greater Letaba have relatively good access, whereas Greater Giyani faces significant challenges. Discussion: Although a majority of the population lived within 5 km of a clinic, notable gaps in accessibility remain. Improving transport infrastructure, using telemedicine and mobile health units, and implementing socio-economic support strategies, such as subsidized transport, can enhance access. Addressing geographic and structural inequalities in healthcare distribution is critical to promoting equity and improving health outcomes in rural districts like Mopani.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.