ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting early postoperative complications after radical gastrectomy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Minimally Invasive and Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery: Major Applications and Recent Advances.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Does adding immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy increase postoperative morbidity in gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma? A propensity score-matched study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative complications significantly impact gastric cancer patients' recovery and remain a major research focus. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model utilizing preoperative and intraoperative data to stratify the risk of early postoperative complications in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy. Methods: Clinical data from gastric cancer patients who underwent radical gastrectomy at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 2014 and 2024 were retrospectively collected. Using R software, ten machine learning algorithms-including eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, random forest, Neural Network, naive Bayes, logistic regression, Linear Discriminant Analysis, K-Nearest Neighbors, Generalized Linear Model with Elastic-Net Regularization and classification tree-were employed to construct predictive models for early postoperative complications. Nested cross-validation was applied for model validation, and performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, decision curve analysis, and calibration curves. Results: A total of 926 patients were included in this study, comprising 667 males (72%) and 259 females (28%), with 131 (14.13%) suffering postoperative complications. Predictive features included smoking, Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 score>3, reconstruction, clinical T-stage>1, operative time, neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy or targeted therapy, and resection site. Among the ten models, eXtreme Gradient Boosting demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.788, along with superior calibration and decision curve analysis results. Conclusion: Based on preoperative and intraoperative data, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting model demonstrated the strongest predictive capability for postoperative complications following radical gastrectomy.These findings underscore the potential of machine learning-based models in stratifying the risk of early postoperative complications in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy, thereby enhancing clinical decision-making and improving patient outcomes in gastric cancer surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.