Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41164102›Full record

ReviewAustralian prescriber2025

Sun protection: a practical guide for health professionals.

Samuel Morriss, Laura Scardamaglia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Australian prescriber, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sunscreen, vitamin D and skin of colour.Australian prescriber · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samuel MorrissThe Royal Melbourne Hospital.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4186-7391
Laura ScardamagliaThe Royal Melbourne Hospital.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6160-8886

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cumulative exposure to ultraviolet radiation drives skin cancer and photo-ageing across all skin types, including people with darker skin. Visible light radiation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of pigmentary conditions. Intense childhood exposure to ultraviolet radiation is a critical risk factor for development of melanoma later in life. Effective sun protection requires a daily, multifaceted approach when the ultraviolet index is 3 or higher. This includes the correct application of broad-spectrum sunscreen with a sun protection factor of 50+ in conjunction with protective clothing, a broad-brimmed hat, sunglasses, and seeking shade. Some medicines may be photosensitising and patients using these medicines should be advised to adopt stricter sun protection measures. There are many myths about sunscreens that may be barriers to sunscreen use, including concerns about endocrine disruption and nanoparticle toxicity. When counselling patients on sun protection, it is important to offer practical, evidence-based advice that extends beyond sunscreen use alone. The goal is to empower patients to incorporate sun safety into their daily routines.

Indexed as

photoprotectionskin ageingskin cancersunlightsun protection factorsunscreenultraviolet rays

Identifiers

PMID41164102
PMCPMC12566446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.