Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41164092›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Tree drawing test as an auxiliary tool for evaluating schizophrenia treatment outcomes.

Yige Liu, Junmei Yuan, Yanfei Zhang, Hui Jin, Li Gao, Wei Liu, Guorui Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yige Liu *Institute of Applied Psychology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Junmei Yuan *Department of Psychiatry, Liaocheng Veterans Hospital, Liaocheng, China.
Yanfei Zhang *Department of Medical Psychology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Hui JinPsychology Research Institute, Nanchang Vocational University, Nanchang, China.
Li GaoSchool of Digital Media and Design Arts, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Wei LiuInstitute of Applied Psychology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Guorui LiuDepartment of Medical Psychology, No. 905 Hospital of PLA Navy, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the changes in quantitative indicators of the Tree Drawing Projection Test across different treatment stages in patients with schizophrenia, in order to provide an objective basis for evaluating treatment efficacy. Methods: A self-controlled study design was employed. Sixty patients with schizophrenia underwent the Tree Drawing Projection Test at three time points: Week 1, Week 13, and Week 37. Differences in drawing indicators were analyzed across these time points. Results: Among patients with schizophrenia, the values of crown area, crown height, crown width, trunk area, and trunk height gradually increased from Week 1 to Week 37, showing observable differences ( Conclusion: In schizophrenia patients, quantitative indicators of the Tree Drawing Projection Test-specifically crown area, crown height, and crown width-demonstrated steady increases across Week 1, Week 13, and Week 37, with these changes being statistically significant. These findings suggest that the Tree Drawing Projection Test can serve as a useful tool for assessing clinical treatment efficacy in schizophrenia.

Indexed as

projective testquantitative indicatorsschizophreniatreatment evaluationtree drawing

Identifiers

PMID41164092
PMCPMC12558914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.