ReviewAllergologie select2025
Ethical aspects of the application of artificial intelligence in allergology.
Review in Allergologie select, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) offers a wide range of applications in allergology, including diagnostics and disease course prediction, consultations, real-time monitoring of allergic reactions, and support for decentralized clinical studies. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis review aims to highlight not only the potential applications but also the ethical aspects of using AI in allergology.
resultsInitial studies demonstrate potential applications of AI in predicting provocation tests and antibiotic delabeling. However, these models from research and development have not yet been established in clinical practice, partly because ethical considerations, alongside technical challenges, and data quality issues, must be addressed. Key ethical dilemmas include bias and fairness, the principle of non-maleficence, data protection and autonomy, transparency of AI models, and questions of accountability. AI applications must be robust and reliable to prevent harm caused by erroneous recommendations.
conclusionThe use of AI in allergology requires clear guidelines based on principles such as autonomy, justice, and non-maleficence. General bioethical principles must be complemented by specific regulations for AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.