ArticleCureus2025
Associations of Intracranial Hemorrhage and Extracranial Injury with Outcomes in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Researchers have shown that extracranial (EC) injuries can influence outcomes in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Large data sets have noted that the presence of EC injury can have detrimental effects on ICH. However, the effects are not well quantified. EC injury has been historically treated as a categorical variable. Only one study besides the current one has attempted to calculate the degree of EC injury in affecting outcomes in ICH. We calculated a novel systemic variable for EC injury as the EC Injury Severity Score (EC-ISS) and aimed to assess the impact of EC injuries on ICH patient outcomes in blunt trauma. Objective Our primary objective was to examine the impact of EC injury on six undesirable outcomes in blunt ICH trauma: (1) mortality, (2) ICU stay ≥2 days, (3) hospital stay >5 days, (4) adverse outcome (AO; mortality, ICU stay ≥2 days, or hospital stay >5 days), (5) no commands at hospital discharge, and (6) no commands at three months. Secondary objectives included comparing EC-ISS and ICH Abbreviated Injury Scale scores (AIS) with ISS. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of adult trauma patients with ICH admitted to a level I trauma center in northeast Ohio from January 21 to July 21 during each year in 2018, 2019, and 2020 (the parent data set was obtained from a prior COVID-19 publication). The population had computed tomography (CT)-confirmed ICH, admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3-15, and blunt trauma. CT ICH mass effect scores were rated as one each for lateral ventricular compression, basal cistern compression, and midline shift (0-3). The ICH CT score was mass effect score plus subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH; 0-5). ICH AIS, ISS, and admission hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg) were from the trauma registry (TR). EC-ISS was ISS minus the ICH AIS score squared. GCS deficit was 15 minus GCS. AOs were hospital death, ICU stay ≥2 days, or hospital stay >5 days. Admission glucose was from the electronic medical record. Results The study included 436 patients. Hospital death was independently associated with ICH mass effect (p<0.0001), age (p=0.0002), EC-ISS (p=0.0002), and ICH AIS (p=0.0010) but not with ISS ≥16 (p=0.8243). Intensive care days had independent associations with GCS (p<0.0001), admission glucose (p = 0.0003), CT score (p<0.0001), EC-ISS (p<0.0001), ICH AIS (p<0.0001), and hypotension (p = 0.0493), but not with ISS ≥16 (p = 0.5517). Hospital days had independent associations with GCS (p<0.0001), admission glucose (p<0.0001), CT score (p=0.0007), EC-ISS (p<0.0001), and ICH AIS (p<0.0001), but not with ISS ≥16 (p=0.2359). AO had independent associations with GCS (p<0.0001), admission glucose (p<0.0016), EC-ISS (p=0.0102), ICH AIS (p<0.0001), hypotension (p=0.0347), and CT score (p=0.0215), but not with ISS ≥16 (p=0.2011). Not following commands at discharge had independent associations with GCS (p=0.0006), EC-ISS (p=0.0459), ICH AIS (p=0.0002), and CT score (p=0.0201), but not with ISS ≥16 (p=0.9500). Not following commands at three months had independent associations with EC-ISS (p<0.0001), ICH AIS (p=0.0006), age (p<0.0001), GCS deficit + EC-ISS (p<0.0001), and hypotension (p=0.0078), but not with ISS ≥16 (p=0.4157). Conclusion ICH AIS and EC-ISS have independent associations with six undesirable ICH outcomes. ICH AIS and EC-ISS may better represent risk conditions in ICH patients when compared with ISS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.