ArticleCureus2025
Integrating Virtual Learning Into a Primarily Cadaveric-Based Curriculum: Medical Students' Perspectives, Opinions, and Attitudes.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human anatomy is a crucial component of medical education, traditionally taught through human cadaveric dissection, prosections, and formal lectures. However, challenges such as limited exposure to material, difficulty visualizing structures, and cadaver shortages have prompted the integration of virtual anatomy technologies, such as software applications, web-based educational three-dimensional (3D) platforms, and virtual reality, into curricula. These resources offer advantages by accommodating different learning styles, enabling the analysis of anatomical structures in various planes, and increasing exposure to learning materials. Although research has explored modernizing anatomy education with virtual tools, limited focus has been placed on student opinions of integrating virtual resources. This study aimed to examine how the first-time implementation of virtual resources, including web-based educational 3D platforms, augmented reality, and software applications, affected student learning and their opinions on the further integration of virtual learning. An Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved survey was conducted with first-year medical students enrolled in an introductory human anatomy course at a single institution. Students completed Likert scale and open-ended response questions regarding their experiences using virtual learning tools. Surveys were distributed to students at the start of the course and after each of the three required examinations. Of the 58 students who consented, 42 responded (72.4%), yielding 65 total responses including duplicates. Among the respondents, 69.2% (n=45) felt virtual resources were more effective compared to traditional methods, and 92.3% (n=60) rated them as slightly to extremely useful. Short-answer responses revealed that students had a positive view of virtual tools and found them helpful for achieving course goals. Students saw potential for the greater integration of virtual learning in anatomical education. Overall, students felt that virtual resources complemented traditional cadaveric dissection, particularly among growing cadaver shortages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.