Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41164059›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Benefits and Future of Clinical Autopsy: A Literature Review.

Mohammad Abdurrahman Khan, Manisha Verma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammad Abdurrahman KhanDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki, Lucknow, IND.
Manisha VermaDepartment of Dentistry, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki, Lucknow, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical autopsies are performed by pathologists in the hospital to diagnose the disease that has caused the death of a person when all antemortem attempts have become unsuccessful. Despite the cause of death being established antemortem, the clinical autopsy is carried out to study the process of disease in situ and to confirm the clinical diagnosis made by the physician. Thus, clinical autopsy enhances and improves the knowledge of medical science. Clinical autopsy is done on the request of family members of the deceased or by the physician; the consent of the deceased's relatives is required. Before starting a clinical autopsy, all the documentary prerequisites should be fulfilled. Basic infrastructure required for clinical autopsy is a furnished room with adequate facilities for cold storage. Clinical autopsies are not restricted to being performed by a pathologist only. Any registered medical practitioner, especially a qualified pathologist, can carry out a clinical autopsy. After taking consent from the family members of the deceased, a needle, partial, or complete autopsy is performed. There are several benefits of clinical autopsies, such as providing benefits to the family members, improving the quality of diagnosis and treatment, training of pathologists and medical students, understanding the mechanism of sudden unexpected death, understanding the mechanism of fetal death, especially with genetic variation, etc. In the current scenario, there is a decline in the clinical autopsy rate despite several benefits of these autopsies. But clinical autopsy is still considered the gold standard as it helps in the measurement of treatment methods, clinical decision-making procedures, and diagnostic tools. For furnishing high-quality services, there should be sufficient pathologists having the required skill, well-trained and supporting staff, along with modern autopsy facilities. Besides this, there should be adequate support from the laboratory for providing a timely report of histopathology and other required tests.

Indexed as

autopsyclinical autopsyfetal autopsyhospital autopsypathologistpathology

Identifiers

PMID41164059
PMCPMC12560806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.