ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2025
Gene therapy for hemophilia: results of ISTH global survey on current knowledge, attitudes, and preparedness of the hemophilia care team.
Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gene therapy has emerged as a transformative treatment for hemophilia, offering the potential for durable factor expression after a single administration. Since 2019, multiple gene therapies have been approved for adults with hemophilia A and B. However, the adoption of gene therapy into clinical practice has been slow, and provider preparedness remains uncertain. Objective: To assess current knowledge, perceptions, and clinical preparedness regarding hemophilia gene therapy among international healthcare professionals. Methods: An anonymous online survey was distributed internationally from August 24, 2023 to January 24, 2024 through four professional organizations. The 24-question survey included items on demographics, perceptions of gene therapy, and knowledge-based questions. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze responses. Results: A total of 327 participants from 66 countries responded. Top concerns with current therapies included dosing burden, inhibitor risk, and venous access. Only 7.5% of respondents were extremely familiar with regulatory guidance on gene therapy, and 35.6% were not comfortable answering patient questions about trials. Perceived barriers to adoption included uncertainty about durability, immune responses, eligibility, and cost. Conclusion: While clinical integration of gene therapy for hemophilia is advancing, this survey highlights persistent gaps in provider knowledge and confidence, especially related to regulatory guidance and clinical trial data. Targeted education and training initiatives are needed to support informed implementation of gene therapy in diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.