ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Development and Validation of Deep Learning Model for Predicting Long-Term Prognosis in Patients with Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) is a leading cause of ischemic stroke, and its progression is associated with an increased risk of stroke recurrence and poor outcomes. Accurate prediction of the risk of progression in ICAS patients is crucial for timely intervention and management. This study aims to develop and validate logistic regression and deep learning models to predict the risk of progression in symptomatic ICAS patients and compare their predictive performance. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 266 symptomatic ICAS patients who were followed for at least 3 years. The dataset was randomly split into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%). Data preprocessing involved normalization, feature selection, and class balancing techniques to enhance model performance. Logistic regression, and deep learning models were developed to predict the risk of ICAS progression. The models were evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The logistic regression model achieved an AUC of 0.771 (training) and 0.767 (validation; 95% CI: 0.702-0.832). The deep learning model demonstrated superior performance with an AUC of 0.898 (training) and 0.863 (validation; 95% CI: 0.801-0.925), showing a statistically significant improvement (p = 0.016, DeLong's test). Feature importance analysis identified hypertension, diabetes, stenosis degree, and prior stroke history as the most influential predictors of ICAS progression. These results highlight the value of early risk stratification to guide timely clinical intervention. Conclusion: Compared to logistic regression, the deep learning model exhibited significantly improved predictive accuracy for the risk of progression in symptomatic ICAS patients. The high performance and reliability of the deep learning model highlight its potential clinical utility in predicting ICAS progression, ultimately aiding in risk stratification and personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.