ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Probe-based metagenomic pathogen detection: advancing laboratory capacity for complex diagnosis.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probe-based pathogen enrichment, followed by NGS, is a promising tool for complex diagnosis, overcoming traditional challenges of shotgun metagenomics, namely small microbial/human genetic material ratio and demanding computational resources. Here, we assessed the combined detection performance of two Illumina probe-based panels, the Respiratory and the Urinary Pathogen ID panels (RPIP and UPIP), using 99 clinical samples of 15 different matrices (e.g., cerebrospinal fluid, plasma, serum, urine, swabs, biopsies, etc.) available from Portuguese National Reference Laboratories. This sample set involved 114 "PCR-positive hits" (Ct values range of 9.7-41.3; median of 28.4) for 52 non-redundant human pathogens. For a more detailed bioinformatics assessment, as a complement of the Illumina turnkey solution (Explify), we applied an extended version of our INSaFLU-TELEVIR(+) metagenomics pipeline. Whereas Explify analyses resulted in an initial detection frequency of 73.7% (84/114), the subsequent application of INSaFLU-TELEVIR(+), including taxonomic classification followed by confirmatory read mapping, enabled an overall detection proportion of 79.8% (91/114) of the PCR-positive hits. This translated into a detection rate increment from 54.3% (19/35) to 65.7% (23/35) for bacteria, and from 85.3% (58/68) to 89.7% (61/68) for viruses. The implemented workflow was also very satisfactory for samples with qPCR Ct values above 30, with an overall detection frequency of 71.8% (28/39) when compared with the 92.0% (46/50) observed for those with Ct ≤ 30. In summary, this study validated and established a pioneering approach at the Portuguese National Institute of Health to support clinicians in complex diagnosis, contributing to advance diagnostic capabilities toward a more informed clinical decision and potential improvement of infectious disease outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.