ArticlePrecision radiation oncology2025
Consensus statement on the exploration of clinical translation and application of electron ultra-high dose rate FLASH radiotherapy.
Article in Precision radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiation oncology at a new frontier: Hotspots, challenges, and emerging advances.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- One-year follow-up after fractionated ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH radiotherapy in patient with extramammary Paget disease of the scrotum.Precision radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Interpretable AI for treatment decision-making in immunoradiotherapy of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based personalized treatment strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: integrating HSP90α for prognosis and survival prediction.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- A Feasibility Study of Preclinical Ocular X-Ray FLASH Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Article
- Consensus statement on the exploration of clinical translation and application of electron ultra-high dose rate FLASH radiotherapy.Precision radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-based evaluation of prognostic benefits from immunotherapy plus targeted therapy with or without radiotherapy or TACE in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- LASSO-Cox model in the prognostic evaluation of radiochemotherapy efficacy for lymph node metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Radiotherapy for glioma in the AI era: current applications and future prospects.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Effective dose to immune cells combined with platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts lymphopenia and prognosis in unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Radiotherapy for primary bone tumors: current techniques and integration of artificial intelligence-a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultra-high dose rate FLASH Radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) has attracted wide attention because the well-known FLASH effect and the extremely short irradiation time. During FLASH-RT, high radiation doses and dose rate (usually thousands of times compared with conventional radiotherapy (CONV-RT)) are delivered to the tumor area. This novel irradiation technique shows a reduction of normal tissue injury (20-40%) in comparison to CONV-RT. Meanwhile, FLASH-RT maintaining comparable tumor killing effect as CONV-RT. With the progress of basic research on FLASH-RT in reducing radiation-induced injury to normal tissues, clinical trials of FLASH-RT have been carried out across the world. To date, there is no consensus in China focused on the exploration of clinical transformation and application of electron FLASH-RT. Therefore, the China Anti-Cancer Association Radiation Oncology Committee and the Chinese Medical Doctor Association Radiation Oncology Physician Committee gathered a group of experts together to develop this consensus statement. The authors discuss their current views on electron FLASH-RT, demonstrate the unresolved questions, provide insights for the further application of this technology in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.