Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41163963›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Effectiveness of integrated nurse-physician management in post-PCI coronary heart disease patients: an analysis based on follow-up data.

Xiaojing Qiu, Songzeng Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaojing QiuSchool of Nursing, Henan Technical Institute, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Songzeng RenInterventional Operating Room, The Third People's Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Post-PCI patients often require coordinated secondary prevention and education. We evaluated whether an integrated nurse-physician management program improves health behaviors, disease knowledge, angina-related health status, and cardiac function vs. routine care. Methods: In a single-center, retrospective, non-randomized cohort, adults after PCI received either an integrated program or routine care. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months and included: Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II), Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire-Short Version (CADE-Q SV), Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-overall), echocardiographic indices (e.g., LVEF, LVFS), and physiological/biochemical markers (SBP, DBP, BMI, triglycerides, LDL). The primary endpoint was change in SAQ-overall from baseline to 3 months. Linear mixed-effects models with fixed effects for group, time, and group × time and a subject-level random intercept estimated estimated marginal means (EMMs) and the between-group difference-in-change ( Results: 128 patients were analyzed (64 integrated; 64 routine). At 3 months, the integrated program produced a significantly greater improvement in SAQ-overall vs. routine care ( Conclusions: Over 3 months post-PCI, integrated nurse-physician management improved patient-reported outcomes and cardiac function beyond routine care, while changes in physiological/biochemical markers were variable. These results support integrating structured nursing-led secondary prevention and education into routine post-PCI management and warrant confirmation in prospective randomized studies.

Indexed as

coronary heart diseaseintegrated carepatient educationPCIquality of lifesecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID41163963
PMCPMC12558862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.