Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41163955›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Biomechanical design of titanium-PEEK combined fusion cage based on PLIF surgical model.

Chunsheng Liu, Yutang Xie, Xinrui Wu, Yanqin Wang, Yanru Xue, Pengcui Li, Wangping Duan, Xiaochun Wei, Weiyi Chen, Jinzhu Yin and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chunsheng LiuCollege of Artificial Intelligence, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China.
Yutang XieCollege of Artificial Intelligence, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China.
Xinrui WuCollege of Artificial Intelligence, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China.
Yanqin WangCollege of Artificial Intelligence, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China.
Yanru XueCollege of Artificial Intelligence, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China.
Pengcui LiShanxi Key Laboratory of Bone and Soft Tissue Injury Repair, Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Wangping DuanShanxi Key Laboratory of Bone and Soft Tissue Injury Repair, Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Xiaochun WeiShanxi Key Laboratory of Bone and Soft Tissue Injury Repair, Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Weiyi ChenCollege of Artificial Intelligence, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China.
Jinzhu YinSinopharm Tongmei General Hospital, Datong, China.
Kai ZhangHuajin Orthopaedic Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Meng ZhangCollege of Artificial Intelligence, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China.
Xiaogang WuCollege of Artificial Intelligence, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China.
Liming HeShanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fusion devices play a critical role in lumbar fusion surgery. Titanium alloy fusion devices offer good biocompatibility and stability, but their mechanical properties far exceed those of bone, leading to stress shielding effects after implantation, which can reduce spinal fusion rates and cause endplate collapse. On the other hand, fusion devices made of polyether ether ketone (PEEK), which has a lower elastic modulus, are not conducive to bone ingrowth and fusion stability due to their material properties. Personalized fusion devices that can precisely adapt to a patient's physiological condition are not widely used due to their lengthy design cycle. This study proposes an optimized design method based on a titanium alloy-PEEK composite structure. By constructing three composite structure models-PEEK core and Ti frame (square hole type, circular hole type, plate type)-and combining finite element compression simulation with machine learning algorithms, the structural parameters are intelligently optimized. The machine learning algorithm used in this study is Back Propagation Neural Network. The aim of this study is to match the equivalent elastic modulus of the fusion device with that of cortical bone. The three optimized fusion devices, along with the Ti fusion device and PEEK fusion device as control groups, were implanted into a traditional PLIF postoperative model for static and transient dynamic analysis. The biomechanical responses of the lumbar spine at various locations after implantation of the five fusion devices were analyzed and compared. The results indicate that all three optimized fusion devices effectively reduce the risk of device settlement, thereby mitigating stress shielding effects, improving fusion rates, and enhancing postoperative lumbar stability. Among them, the circular hole inner core fusion device (M2) demonstrated the best overall performance. The peak von Mises stress of L4 lower endplate and L5 upper endplate in M2 model were 54.2% and 27.7% respectively lower than those in Ti fusion device. Compared with Ti fusion device, the strain energy of M2 model increased by 49.7%. The development framework of this study which integrated "finite element simulation-machine learning-postoperative model biomechanical validation and evaluation" can effectively reduce the design cycle and cost of personalized orthopedic implants.

Indexed as

biomechanical analysisfinite element methodfusion device designlumbar fusionstress shielding

Identifiers

PMID41163955
PMCPMC12558872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.