ArticleHealth science reports2025
Recreational Noise Exposure and Hearing Protection Practices Among Syrian Students in Damascus University: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Hearing loss is a global public health concern, with the World Health Organization projecting nearly 2.5 billion affected individuals by 2050. Work-related and recreational noise contribute significantly to hearing impairment, yet there is limited research on this issue in Syria. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 391 participants from students at Damascus University, using convenience sampling at Damascus University, the largest university in Syria. A questionnaire, adapted from a UK study, was utilized to collect data on sociodemographic factors, beliefs about hearing loss, leisure noise exposure, and hearing protection devices (HPD) usage. Statistical analyses included logistic regressions to identify predictors of recreational noise exposure and HPD usage. Results: 45.8% of participants reported occasional recreational noise exposure, with 11.7% experiencing weekly exposure. However, HPD usage remained low at 8.4%. Logistic regressions revealed that gender, age, and personal hearing difficulty did not significantly predict noise exposure or HPD usage. Participants exhibited a high belief (98%) in genetic causes of hearing loss. Conclusion: This study unveils a gap in understanding and addressing recreational noise exposure among Damascus University students. The prevalence aligns with global trends, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. Low HPD usage and prevalent beliefs in genetic causes of hearing loss underscore cultural influences and emphasize the necessity for culturally sensitive interventions. To advance public health, tailored interventions and educational programs within academic institutions are imperative. These findings lay the foundation for culturally sensitive public health initiatives.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.