ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2025
Atrial Esophageal Fistulas: A Case Series Demonstrating Three Distinct Operative Approaches with Favorable Outcomes.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial esophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare complication of atrial ablation procedures. Because of the low incidence and associated morbidity and mortality, there is no consensus on optimal treatment. We present our experience with 4 patients, each with a different management strategy. Methods: Retrospective chart review of 4 patients treated for AEF at a single tertiary care center was performed. Patients were treated between March 2020 and April 2024. Results: Three patients underwent surgical repair of the AEF and 1 underwent a combination of endoscopic and percutaneous approaches. Two of the surgical patients underwent right thoracotomy, while the third was approached via median sternotomy on cardiopulmonary bypass followed by a right thoracotomy. The 3 patients who underwent surgical repair are alive and tolerating oral intake. The patient who underwent endoscopic/percutaneous AEF repair had a considerably higher surgical risk at baseline. The patient recovered from the initial interventions and was discharged home but represented with AEF progression and subsequently expired secondary to neurologic sequalae. Conclusions: For AEF, open surgical management with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass has historically been the first-line treatment. Although successful management of AEF with endoscopic treatment has been documented in the literature, only surgical repair was successful in this case series. This series suggests that surgical management should be pursued for all patients except those with highly prohibitive surgical risk.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.