ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2025
Outcomes of Access Center Transfers for Thoracic Surgical Issues.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Uninterrupted access to thoracic surgical care is limited to large tertiary care centers. Our aim was to characterize the value that interhospital transfers bring to a tertiary care center. Methods: Retrospective review of access center calls for patients with thoracic surgery needs between April 2022 and August 2023 was performed. Data collected included number/time of calls, diagnosis of requested transfer, number of transfers, number/type of procedures performed, distance of transfer, and characteristics of in-system vs out-of-system patients. Procedures performed were defined as major (performed by thoracic surgeons) or minor (performed by nonthoracic surgery proceduralists). Results: In total, 367 phone calls occurred over 17 months (22 calls/mo) with 261 calls (71%) leading to transfers. Of those transferred, 169 patients (65%) received an intervention, totaling 218 procedures. Of these procedures, 93 (43%) were major operations, accounting for 15% of thoracic surgery volume, and 125 (57%) were minor procedures. The most common major operations were decortication (33 of 94, 35%), and wedge resections (16 of 94, 17%). Fifty-one out-of-system hospitals accounted for a higher volume (58% vs 42%), and a longer median transfer distance (13.8 vs 48.1 miles). However, in-system transfers were more likely to lead to major thoracic procedures (49% vs 38%). Conclusions: This is the first study to provide details on interhospital transfers for thoracic surgery needs. A substantial portion of transferred patients undergo an invasive procedure by thoracic surgeons and other proceduralists. The study highlights an underappreciated part of thoracic surgeons' contribution to patient care in the community and hospital system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.