ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2025
Robotic-Assisted Left Ventricular Epicardial Lead Placement in Patients With Prior Sternotomy.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves activity tolerance and slows decline in chronic heart failure patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Traditionally, biventricular lead-based pacing devices or defibrillators are placed intravenously, although some patients require surgical epicardial LV lead placement due to vascular anatomic abnormalities, endocardial fibrosis, or high risk for bacteremia. In patients with prior sternotomy, epicardial lead placement through a thoracotomy, despite a comparatively larger incisional burden, is often preferred over thoracoscopy given the presence of dense adhesions. Approaches that minimize chest wall dissection, however, may allow more patients to safely undergo CRT. This study describes our experience with robotic-assisted LV lead placement in patients with a prior sternotomy. Methods: A single-institution, retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients with a prior sternotomy referred for surgical epicardial lead placement between January 2018 and July 2023. Results: The analysis included 6 patients with a mean age of 75 years. All leads were placed successfully with a robotic-assisted approach. One patient required conversion to thoracotomy due to significant mediastinal adipose tissue burden. The median length of stay was 2 days. Mortality at 30 days was 0%. One patient sustained unilateral phrenic nerve injury, and a wound infection developed in 1 patient that required subsequent CRT device explant. Conclusions: Robotic LV lead placement is feasible in patients with prior sternotomy. Despite significant comorbidities, lengths of stay and perioperative complications were acceptable. Patients with relative contraindication to epicardial LV lead placement, such as those with a prior sternotomy, may benefit from a robotic-assisted approach.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.