ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2025
Myocardial Viability by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The predictive value of myocardial viability assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is uncertain. Other assessment modalities have not shown a correlation between viability and post-CABG survival. Methods: Patients from a single institution between 2014 and 2022 with ischemic cardiomyopathy who were undergoing isolated CABG and who had preoperative CMR viability assessment were included. Patients were grouped by left anterior descending artery territory viability: 0% fibrosis, 25% to 50% fibrosis, and 75% to 100% fibrosis. Primary outcomes were postoperative improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and 3-year survival. Analyses were adjusted for The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Morbidity or Mortality scores. Results: A total of 106 patients met inclusion criteria, and they were divided into 3 groups by myocardial viability. There were no significant differences in preoperative or operative factors among the groups. Left ventricular ejection fraction improvement was seen in 60.3% of patients in the viable without fibrosis group, 79.0% of patients in the viable with fibrosis group, and 57.1% of patients in the nonviable group. Adjusted odds ratios of ejection fraction improvement among the groups demonstrated no significant differences. Similarly, there were no differences in patient survival by 3 years after CABG on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Conclusions: Myocardial viability assessment by CMR for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who are undergoing surgical revascularization does not predict left ventricular functional improvement or 3-year survival. Our data suggest that nonviable left anterior descending artery territory as assessed by CMR should not be a contraindication to CABG in otherwise appropriate surgical candidates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.