ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2025
Adherence to CheckMate 577 Within a Community Health Care System in the First 2 Years After Approval.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: CheckMate 577 demonstrated a significant benefit with adjuvant nivolumab for those with residual disease after esophagectomy following chemoradiation, resulting in subsequent Food and Drug Administration approval and guideline inclusion. We analyzed adherence to this recommendation in a nontrial setting and assessed for factors associated with noncompliance within our health care system. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of patients with esophageal cancer within a multistate community health care system between February 2021 and December 2022. Patients with resected residual disease following induction chemoradiation were included. Patients were assigned to categories of those offered nivolumab and those not, then assessed for demographic, socioeconomic, or clinical factors associated with nonadherence. Area Deprivation Index was used as surrogate for socioeconomic status. Patients completing year-long nivolumab were then compared with those discontinuing prematurely for factors associated with noncompletion. Results: Of the 73 patients eligible for nivolumab, 67 (92%) were offered therapy. Not being offered nivolumab was associated with receiving care from medical oncologists located in more disadvantaged communities. Of patients offered nivolumab, 57 of 67 (85%) initiated treatment. Year-long immunotherapy was completed by 25 (48%) patients. Patients with node-positive disease were more likely to have completed year-long nivolumab. Conclusions: In the first 2 years after CheckMate 577, results within our health care system suggest high clinician adherence to and patient acceptance of adjuvant immunotherapy with decreased adoption in more socioeconomically challenged oncology offices. In addition, compliance with the year-long adjuvant regimen mirrored clinical trial results. These results warrant further validation in a more diverse, less affluent population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.