Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41163821›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of medicine & medical sciences

Visual Outcomes in Patients with Mixed Astigmatism after Photorefractive Keratectomies with Different Ablation Zones: A Single-center Study from Saudi Arabia.

Mohammed A M AlRubaish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohammed A M AlRubaishDepartment of Ophthalmology, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Studies from Saudi Arabia regarding the use of photorefractive keratectomies (PRK) and the optimum optical zones in the treatment of adults with mixed astigmatism are lacking. Objective: To determine the outcome of PRK treatment in adult patients with mixed astigmatism and the difference in efficacy between different optical zones sizes. Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients with mixed astigmatism who underwent PRK at an ophthalmology clinic in Dammam, Saudi Arabia, between January 2016 and December 2019. Examination of patients included uncorrected distal visual acuity and corrected distal visual acuity. All surgeries were conducted by a single surgeon using the standard PRK technique with different optical zones: ≤6.5 mm and >6.5 mm (i.e., 7 mm and 7.5 mm). Patients were followed up monthly for 3 months. Results: This study included a total of 65 eyes of 36 consecutive patients who underwent the PRK procedure during the study period. In the Snellen chart assessment, there was a steady increase in the number of patients whose postoperative uncorrected visual acuity was within 1 line of the preoperative corrected visual acuity. In terms of the efficacy of different optical zones, the difference between both groups (i.e., the 6.5 mm and >6.5 mm groups) in each of the three follow-ups was statistically insignificant (first follow-up, Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the optical zone ranging from 6.5 mm to 7.5 mm yields comparable results.

Indexed as

Corrected visual acuitymixed astigmatismoptical zonephotorefractive keratectomySaudi Arabiauncorrected visual acuity

Identifiers

PMID41163821
PMCPMC12560990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.