ArticleJournal of medical physics
Effectiveness of RapidPlan in Combination with Multicriteria Optimization for Cervix Radiotherapy Planning.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to explore the construction method of a RapidPlan (RP) model for cervical cancer based on knowledge-based planning (KBP) and to evaluate the effect of its combined application with multicriteria optimization (MCO) technology. Methods: Eighty cervical cancer patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy in our hospital were retrospectively selected and then randomly divided into two groups: 60 patients for model training and 20 patients for testing. Using professional algorithms and software tools, we constructed an RP model. This model was then combined with MCO technology to design and optimize treatment plans for cervical cancer cases, generating a combined RP_MCO plan. We statistically compared and analyzed the differences in planning efficiency and dosimetric parameters, such as target coverage and doses to organs at risk (OARs), between the combined plan and traditional manual plans (MPs). Results: The RP_MCO group significantly reduced the planning time compared to the MP group and the MP_MCO group. Specifically, the RP_MCO group decreased the planning time by 15.2 min compared to the MP group ( Conclusion: The combination of the KBP-based RP model and MCO provides a more efficient and higher-quality planning design scheme for cervical cancer radiotherapy. This approach is expected to enhance treatment outcomes and promote the quality of life for cervical cancer patients in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.