ArticleJournal of medical physics
A Combined Loss-driven Framework for Automated Parotid Segmentation in Head-and-Neck Computed Tomography.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study presents a deep learning framework for automatic parotid segmentation using three-dimensional (3D) U-Net and attention-augmented 3D U-Net architectures trained with a novel combined loss function tailored for anatomical accuracy and class imbalance. Materials and Methods: A curated dataset of 379 noncontrast head-and-neck computed tomography scans with expert-verified contours was used. Two architectures a residual 3D U-Net and its attention-enhanced variant were implemented using TensorFlow. The networks were trained with both categorical cross-entropy and a proposed combined loss integrating modified Dice Score Coefficient (mDSC) and focal loss (FL) with weights 0.7 and 0.3. The models were evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Intersection over Union (IoU), and categorical accuracy. A custom checkpointing strategy was designed to preserve model weights corresponding to both peak DSC and minimum validation loss. The code and pretrained models are hosted on a publicly available GitHub repository at: https://github.com/1aryantyagi/Segmentation-Paper. Results: The 3D U-Net trained with the combined loss achieved a median Dice score of 0.8835 (left parotid) and 0.8709 (right), with mean IoU values of 0.7672 and 0.7358, indicating strong segmentation accuracy. The U-Net produced comparable results, supporting the combined loss's consistency. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed reduced variability and improved agreement. Conclusion: The integration of mDSC and FL within a 3D U-Net architecture significantly improves segmentation performance, robustness, and spatial precision. These findings support the clinical feasibility of the proposed framework for automated, reproducible parotid delineation in radiotherapy planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.