ArticleNeurosurgery practice2025
External Lumbar Drainage to Abort Severe Traumatic IntraCranial Hypertension Phase 1 Randomized Clinical Trial: Scientific Rationale and Methodology: An MTBI
Article in Neurosurgery practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThere has been renewed interest in the use of external lumbar drainage (ELD) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to reduce intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although the evidence is retrospective and thus confounded by selection bias, it is critical that a phase 1 trial systematically identify "select" patients who would gain benefit of intracranial pressure (ICP) reduction from lumbar drainage. The aim of this study is to evaluate safety and feasibility of controlled CSF ELD in reducing ICP burden and improving outcomes of select severe TBI patients.
methodsThe study will include 30 severe TBI patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤9 who will be randomized to usual treatment, usual treatment plus early ELD placement if initial ICP ≤20 mm Hg, or late ELD if ICP ≥20 mm Hg as first intervention in tier 2 of Seattle International Brain Injury Consensus Consortium protocol. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: It is expected that the incidence of severe neurological worsening events as per Seattle International Brain Injury Consensus Consortium will not be different between the control and intervention groups. DISCUSSION: A multitude of clinical trials to advance or discover new treatments of severe TBI have remained unfruitful. Recent understanding of the glymphatic system in the brain is suggestive that extraventricular CSF drainage may be very useful in reducing ICP. The natural avenue for this is through ELD. To avoid past mistakes by jumping into an advanced stage trial, we intend to conduct a phase 1 safety and feasibility trial to identify 'select' patients in whom ELD may be performed safely and may serve as a significant change of therapeutic approach to such patients with traumatic intracranial hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.