ArticleNeurosurgery practice2025
Neuro Data Hub: A New Approach for Streamlining Medical Clinical Research.
Article in Neurosurgery practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced Multimodal AI for Predicting Long-Term Functional Outcomes After Ischemic Stroke Using Only Admission Data.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesNeurosurgical clinical research depends on medical data collection and evaluation that is often laborious, time consuming, and inefficient. The goal of this work was to implement and evaluate a novel departmental data infrastructure (Neuro Data Hub) designed to provide specialized data services for neurosurgical research. Data acquisition would become available purely by request.
methodsWe established the New York University Langone Health
resultsThe Hub processed 39 research data requests (2.6/month), comprising 3 basic, 22 complex, and 14 NLP-augmented requests. Two complex requests included visualization services, and one NLP request included database creation. Average request execution time was 36.5 days, with NLP-augmented requests showing increasing adoption over time.
conclusionThe Neuro Data Hub represents a paradigm shift from centralized to department-level data services, providing specialized support for neurosurgical research and democratizing access to institutional data. While effective, implementation may be limited by institutional information technology infrastructure requirements. This model could serve as a template for any form of medical-clinical research program seeking to improve data accessibility and research capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.