ArticleOrthopedic reviews2025
Post-traumatic elbow stiffness in adolescents: open vs. arthroscopic management and comparison with adults.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Autologous protein solution and 3D-Printed technologies as potential adjuncts to arthroscopic elbow release: a narrative review and conceptual framework.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-traumatic elbow stiffness in adolescents is a complex challenge that requires individualized treatment approaches. While open arthrolysis remains the most commonly used technique, arthroscopic techniques have emerged as a promising alternative with potential advantages in this younger population. This narrative review aims to emphasize the advantages of arthroscopic arthrolysis over the open approach in the adolescent patient. In addition, we explore how differences in etiology, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment response between adolescents and adults influence decision-making and outcomes. Methods: A narrative review of the current literature on post-traumatic elbow stiffness in adolescents was conducted. Clinical studies, previous reviews, and recent advancements were analyzed. Clinical examples from our center were also presented. Results: Arthroscopic arthrolysis was associated with improved range of motion, faster recovery, and lower complication rates in selected patients. However, open arthrolysis remains superior in cases with severe deformity, heterotopic ossification, or prior surgical history. In our experience, the indications for arthroscopic arthrolysis can be expanded when performed by experienced surgeons. Conclusion: Even though open arthrolysis remains the gold standard for complex elbow stiffness, arthroscopic approaches show promising outcomes in adolescents and could be used more widely in centers with sufficient expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.