ArticlePalliative care and social practice2025
The perspectives of patients, relatives, and healthcare providers on end-of-life communication in an Italian Oncological Institute.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Studies have highlighted a perceived lack of information concerning end-of-life (EoL) decisions and discrepancies in communication between physicians and cancer patients, despite the fact that sharing these dimensions remains central to the therapeutic process. Objective: We aimed to investigate healthcare professionals' disclosure of information on EoL, considering the perspectives of professionals and patients and relatives, and the professional factors that may affect communication. Design: The descriptive, mono-centric study E.L.D.Y.-CA.RE. (End of Life Decisions study - CAregivers RElatives) was conducted in 2018 at the Veneto Institute of Oncology in Padua, Italy. Methods: Three different questionnaires were created for professionals, patients, and caregivers to investigate EoL decisions, opinions, psychological reactions, and quality of communication. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression were carried out, in order to corroborate the data. Results: A total of 425 questionnaires were completed by 136 healthcare professionals, 171 patients, and 118 relatives. Some subjects were frequently discussed: diagnosis and purpose of medical treatment (89%) or possible complications (92%); less frequently discussed subjects were life expectancy (22%), existential and spiritual dimensions (11%), withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (11%), and the option of hastening death (3%). Discrepancies emerged especially regarding palliative options, care delivery problems, emotional/psychological, and social problems. Up to 55% of patients did not answer questions because they believed they were not relevant to their health and a consistent proportion of professionals still felt inadequate in communicating bad news and in confronting with terminally ill patients. As emerged from logistic regression models, role, gender, age, and previous training of healthcare professionals, as well as strength of their own and the patients' beliefs, significantly influenced the subjects discussed. Conclusion: The perceptions of EoL communication in physician-patient and physician-relative relationships reveal ongoing problems in terms of sensitive and psychological issues, which are often experienced differently. At the same time, the management of terminally ill patients has an emotional impact on medical professionals and affects how they view death. Increased attention to palliative care and training in both communication and bioethics may help to improve professional communication skills and make healthcare professionals better prepared to manage the final stages of a patient's life and personal reactions to death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.