ArticleHaematologica2026
Marked survival gains in patients ≤ 65 years with advanced-stage mantle cell lymphoma: a pooled analysis of six randomized phase III trials, 1996-2020.
Article in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving survival and narrowing age disparities in mantle cell lymphoma across therapeutic eras.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- Mantle cell lymphoma artificial intelligence prognostic index using hematoxylin and eosin histology.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Advances in targeted and cellular therapies for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: immunotherapeutic strategies and challenges.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Transforming mantle cell lymphoma: the journey across eras.Haematologica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains a challenging and generally incurable disease. We aimed to evaluate survival trends in advanced-stage MCL over the past three decades, focusing on the impact of evolving first-line therapies. We pooled six randomized phase III trials of treatment-naïve, advanced-stage MCL patients enrolled between 1996 and 2020. Patients were grouped into four eras by enrollment period. Failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared across eras using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression adjusted for the Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) and treatment. Dynamic survival trends were analyzed using penalized splines. Among 2,541 MCL patients, survival outcomes have improved steadily since 1996. In younger and transplant-eligible patients (≤ 65 years), there was a strong increase in median OS from 4.9 years (5-year OS: 49%) in the period 1996-2000 to 13.8 years (73%) in 2004-2014 and was not reached (84%) in 2016-2020. In older and transplant-ineligible patients, median OS improved from 3.8 to 4.8 years (5-year OS: 40-49%) between 1996 and 2014. Dynamic trends revealed a sharp decline in treatment failure and mortality risk between 2000 and 2005, followed by sustained improvements. Patients receiving the same treatment regimens had comparable FFS and OS across eras. Adjusting for treatment eliminated most survival trends, underscoring the impact of rituximab, ASCT, high-dose cytarabine, and ibrutinib on survival improvements. In conclusion, OS in MCL has substantially improved over the past three decades, especially in younger patients, driven largely by improvements in first-line treatment. In older patients, despite significantly improved OS in recent decades, there remains an urgent need for further improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.