ArticleACR open rheumatology2025
Characterization of Second-Line Therapy After First JAK Inhibitor Use: Results From the CorEvitas Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry.
Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 2024 Update of the Asia-Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR) Recommendations for Rheumatoid Arthritis Management.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026Guideline
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe performed a real-world characterization of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who initiate a JAK inhibitor (JAKi) and switch to a subsequent therapy and examination of factors associated with the use of another JAKi/therapy with another mechanism of action (MoA).
methodsThis study included patients with RA in the US CorEvitas RA Registry who initiated a JAKi (August 16, 2019, to October 30, 2023), had prior exposure to at least one conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) and at least one biologic DMARD (bDMARD), and switched to another therapy within three months of JAKi discontinuation. Patients were classified as JAKi "cyclers" or "switchers" from JAKi to another MoA. Outcomes evaluated from JAKi initiation to cycle/switch included the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score and patient-reported outcomes. Factors associated with switching versus cycling were identified using multivariable logistic regression models.
resultsA total of 197 patients were included: 27.9% were cyclers, and 72.1% were switchers; most had moderate/high CDAI scores and received initial JAKi as a fourth or higher line of therapy. From JAKi initiation to switch, improvements in CDAI scores/patient-reported outcomes were numerically greater for cyclers versus switchers. History (present ever/at enrollment) of hypertension was associated with higher odds, and history of fibromyalgia and prior use of two or more bDMARDs versus one bDMARD were associated with lower odds of switching versus cycling.
conclusionIn this real-world US study of patients with RA, compared with switching, cycling was observed in patients with better response to initial JAKi, a history of fibromyalgia, and prior use of two or more bDMARDs. Sample size, which was smaller in cyclers than in switchers, limited the study; larger studies are required to evaluate effectiveness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.