ArticleJournal of dental education2026
Stitching the Future: Comparing Multiple Suturing Models for Training Predoctoral Dental Students.
Article in Journal of dental education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PURPOSE/
objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the experiences of predoctoral dental students in practicing suturing skills across multiple models and to determine which model is most suitable for providing appropriate learning to consolidate these skills.
methodsIn this study, a total of 44 fifth-year predoctoral dental students attended the training-a 1-h session on suture materials, instruments, and techniques. Four distinct tissue-like materials were used: dry sponge, banana peel, silicone, and chicken breast. The students placed three simple sutures on each material, after which a questionnaire was administered to them to evaluate the suture models. Two experienced oral and maxillofacial surgeons evaluated the students' sutures on each model. The participants also reported their perceived confidence levels before and after the theoretical training and after practicing suturing on the models.
resultsThe suturing experience varied significantly across tissue types, with the silicone model receiving the highest scores from students (p < 0.001). Students who practiced on models demonstrated a statistically significant increase in self-confidence in placing sutures (p < 0.001). The silicone model achieved the highest scores from the assessors.
conclusionSimulated dental settings provide a suitable learning environment for dental students to learn basic suturing techniques before their transition to clinical practice. The findings suggest that silicone models can be used effectively to train dental students in basic suturing skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.