ArticleCurrent medical imaging2026
Non-invasive Prediction of Lung Cancer Histological Differentiation via Radiomics and Multi-binary Classification Models
Article in Current medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe histological differentiation of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) is a critical prognostic factor that influences therapeutic strategies and patient outcomes. However, conventional assessment methods relying on postoperative pathology or biopsy are invasive and limited by sampling bias. Therefore, it is of great clinical significance to develop a non-invasive, imaging-based approach for accurate preoperative differentiation evaluation.
methodsThis retrospective study included 184 NSCLC patients with preoperative chest CT scans and confirmed pathological differentiation grades from 2022 to 2024. Radiomics features were extracted using PyRadiomics, followed by feature selection via the LASSO algorithm. A novel three-task binary classification strategy was proposed to replace conventional trinary classification, including low vs. non-low, moderate vs. non-moderate, and high vs. non-high differentiation. Four machine learning models-GBDT, RF, XGBoost, and LightGBM-were constructed and evaluated using ROC analysis, confusion matrices, and SHAP-based interpretability analysis.
resultsThe GBDT model achieved the highest AUC (0.849) in the low differentiation classification task, while the RF model outperformed others in predicting high differentiation (AUC = 0.7188). The moderate differentiation task showed relatively poor performance across all models (AUC < 0.55). SHAP analysis revealed that features such as original_firstorder_Kurtosis, glrlm_RunEntropy, and wavelet-HLL_firstorder_Median played key roles in differentiating tumor grades, highlighting their biological relevance and potential utility in clinical interpretation. DISCUSSION: The proposed multi-binary strategy improved classification granularity and interpretability. Ensemble learning models demonstrated robust performance across tasks, especially for extreme differentiation levels.
conclusionThis study, which combines radiomics with a multi-task machine learning framework, demonstrates prediction and can improve the accuracy and interpretability of preoperative lung cancer differentiation. The proposed model provides a non-invasive, quantitative tool with the potential to support individualized clinical decision-making. Further multicenter validation and multimodal data integration are warranted to enhance its clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.