ArticleCurrent pharmaceutical design2026
Nephrotoxicity Evaluation of Green and Chemically Synthesized Copper Oxide Nanoparticles in Rats: A Biochemical and Genotoxic Approach.
Article in Current pharmaceutical design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to synthesize and characterize copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs) using Rhus punjabensis extract and chemical methodologies. The comparative nephrotoxicity of greensynthesized CuO NPs (G-CuO-NPs) and chemically synthesized CuO NPs (C-CuO NPs) were examined in Sprague-Dawley rats and their offspring following oral administration during pregnancy and lactation.
methodsFourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), and X-ray Diffraction (XRD) were employed to examine the morphology, dimensions, and functional groups of the fabricated CuO NPs. To assess the relative nephrotoxicity of G-CuO-NPs and C-CuO-NPs at doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg, twenty-five rats were randomly allocated to five groups (designated as G1, G2, G3, G4, and G5), with each group comprising one male and four female animals for mating purposes. Nephrotoxicity of both parental and offspring animals was evaluated by examining their antioxidant status, total protein content, lipid peroxidation, genotoxicity, serum biochemistry, and histopathology.
resultsFT-IR confirmed the synthesis of CuO NPs, while TEM and SEM revealed that G-CuO NPs were spherical and C-CuO NPs were oval. The XRD analysis showed that both NPs had a monoclinic structure. The crystalline dimensions of G-CuO NPs were 36.6 nm, and 32.85 nm for C-CuO NPs. C-CuO NPs showed dose-dependent toxicity in both parents and pups, causing a disturbance in the antioxidant balance, reducing protein content, and inducing lipid peroxidation and genotoxicity in the renal tissues. The morphological architecture of the parents' kidneys and renal function were evaluated. G-CuO NPs, on the other hand, showed mild toxicity only in the parents. DISCUSSION: The findings indicate that G-CuO NPs exhibit biocompatibility and are suitable for biological applications. This study underscores the compatibility of plant-derived metallic nanoparticles with living systems and paves the way for investigating their potential applications in contexts where toxicity limits the use of nanoparticles.
conclusionBased on these findings, the biocompatibility of green-synthesized CuO NPs was determined, and they did not induce nephrotoxicity in both parents and their offspring. In contrast, chemically synthesized CuO NPs, when administered at higher concentrations, were found to cause nephrotoxicity, which may also be transmitted to the offspring through lactation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41163271What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.