ArticleCurrent medicinal chemistry2026
Identification of Potential Biomarkers and Drugs for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Using Computational Analysis and Molecular Docking.
Article in Current medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPapillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), the most common thyroid malignancy, presents with multiple variants. This study aimed to identify potential biomarkers and therapeutic candidates for PTC through computational analyses and molecular docking.
methodsGene expression data related to PTC were obtained from the TCGA-THCA and GEO datasets (GSE35570 and GSE33630) to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Functional enrichment analysis was performed on the DEGs, followed by construction of a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. Hub genes were identified using recursive feature elimination (RFE) and LASSO regression analyses. A nomogram incorporating these hub genes was developed, and its diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Furthermore, the relationship between hub genes and immune cell infiltration was investigated. Potential drug candidates targeting the hub genes were predicted and validated through molecular docking.
resultsCommon DEGs across the three datasets were enriched in pathways such as ECM-receptor interaction, proteoglycans in cancer, and cell adhesion molecules. Significantly enriched GO terms included 'binding,' 'receptor activity,' 'integral component of membrane,' 'cytoplasm,' 'cell adhesion,' and 'immune response.' A PPI network was constructed by intersecting the common DEGs with PTC-related targets. Machine learning algorithms identified three hub genes: SRY-box transcription factor 4 (SOX4), cyclin D1 (CCND1), and lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (LYVE1). These hub genes exhibited differential expression in PTC and were used to construct a reliable diagnostic model. Furthermore, molecular docking revealed stable binding between CCND1 and Tipifarnib, suggesting potential therapeutic relevance. DISCUSSION: While previous studies have applied bioinformatics and molecular docking in PTC research, this study uniquely integrates both approaches to identify the hub gene CCND1 and its potential targeting drug, Tipifarnib, as promising molecular markers and therapeutic candidates for PTC.
conclusionThe hub gene CCND1 and its targeting drug candidate Tipifarnib may contribute to PTC treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41163265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.