ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2025
Japanese value set for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Eight Dimension (FACT-8D) cancer-specific preference-based quality of life instrument.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General (FACT-G) questionnaire is frequently used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer patients. However, data obtained using the FACT-G cannot be directly used to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The newly developed FACT Eight Dimensions (FACT-8D) is a preference-based measure that generates health utilities scores from 9 of the 27 FACT-G items, representing eight HRQOL domains (Nausea, Pain, Fatigue, Sleep, Work, Worry, Sadness, Support from family/friends). This study aimed to create a Japanese FACT-8D value set.
methodsA cross-sectional online survey of the Japanese general population recruited participants via a Japanese online panel, quota sampled by age (≥ 18 years) and sex. FACT-8D valuation data were collected with a discrete choice experiment. The valuation task required each participant to consider 16 pairs of hypothetical health states, randomly assigned per participant from 800 choice-sets. Preference weights were obtained from conditional logit models by dividing estimated HRQOL coefficients by the life duration coefficient.
resultsData from 2320 participants were used to assess sample representativeness and estimate the Japanese value set. All preference weights other than Worry Level 2 were negative and increased in absolute terms in progressively higher levels of adverse HRQOL impact. The most influential domains for health utilities were Pain and Nausea, followed by Work problems. Fatigue, Sleep, Support, Sadness, and health Worry had moderate influences on health utilities. The lowest score, for the pit state [55555555], was − 0.60. This value is much lower than that of the EORTC QLU-C10D pit state [4444444444], -0.22. Health states were consistently scored higher in the USA, Australia and the UK than in Japan. Canadian health states are generally lower than for Japan, but not universally so.
conclusionsWe established the Japanese FACT-8D value set based on the internationally common protocol. The value set provides another option for quantifying health utilities for cancer outcomes. This contributes to improving the feasibility of deriving health utilities from the widely used FACT-G.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.