ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025
Enhancing molecular property prediction through data integration and consistency assessment.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Algorithms to Assets: A Comprehensive Review of AI's Role in Preclinical Drug Discovery and the Hurdles to Clinical Translation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI-Driven Drug Discovery: Focus on Targets for Solid Tumors.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Data curation in cheminformatics: importance and implementation.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data heterogeneity and distributional misalignments pose critical challenges for machine learning models, often compromising predictive accuracy. These challenges are exemplified in preclinical safety modeling, a crucial step in early-stage drug discovery where limited data and experimental constraints exacerbate integration issues. Analyzing public ADME datasets, we uncovered significant misalignments as well as inconsistent property annotations between gold-standard and popular benchmark sources, such as Therapeutic Data Commons. These dataset discrepancies, which can arise from differences in various factors, including experimental conditions in data collection as well as chemical space coverage, can introduce noise and ultimately degrade model performance. Data standardization, despite harmonizing discrepancies and increasing the training set size, may not always lead to an improvement in predictive performance. This highlights the importance of rigorous data consistency assessment (DCA) prior to modeling. To facilitate a systematic DCA across diverse datasets, we developed AssayInspector, a model-agnostic package that leverages statistics, visualizations, and diagnostic summaries to identify outliers, batch effects, and discrepancies. Beyond preclinical safety, DCA can play a crucial role in federated learning scenarios, enabling effective transfer learning across heterogeneous data sources and supporting reliable integration across diverse scientific domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.