ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2025
Seasonal PM
Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- RNAseq analysis demonstrates polarization state-dependent responses to ambient particulate matter in a particle composition-specific manner.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAir pollution, specifically fine particulate matter (PM
resultsSummer and fall PM
conclusionsSeasonal variations in PM2.5 composition during winter, spring, and fall-coinciding with influenza season-likely enhance pro-inflammatory responses to viral infection, with early inflammation contributing to worsened pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.